Donald Boudreaux writes:
… from page 26 of Philip Hamburger’s learned, timely, and important 2014 book, Is Administrative Law Unlawful? (footnote deleted):
The relevance of absolute power for administrative law became more clear when one realizes that Anglo-American law has a history of an extra- and supralegal power in what what known as the “prerogative.” This was the name of the power claimed by the English kings, and it corresponds to the administrative power claimed by the president or under his authority.
U.S. presidents today, with the complicity of the courts and through the cowardice of Congress, routinely issue diktats of the sort that rightly stoked the anger and fear of the great Anglo-American constitutionalists such as Sir Edward Coke and the framers of the U.S. Constitution.
Source: Quotation of the Day… – Cafe Hayek
When kids don’t get a chance to play on their own, they grow fearful and depressed because only during playtime do they get to be the adults—to learn how to make decisions, deal with consequences, solve problems and really be a person instead of a precious possession or pet.
Source: Does Helicopter Parenting Turn Kids into Depressed College Students? – Hit & Run : Reason.com
I highly recommend if you plan to travel, and I just listened to it (during my commute). Surely it’s better with the video. It’s based on the author‘s book The Art of Travel.
THE ART OF TRAVEL, presented by Alain de Botton (and based on his bestselling book of the same name), looks into the philosophical impulses behind travelling and in doing so offers a profound and often witty view of some of the deeper issues underlying travel and our desire for it.
Thanks to Russ Roberts for interviewing Alain de Botton at EconTalk about his book The Pleasures and Sorrows of Work.
College students are increasingly demanding protection from words and ideas they don’t like. Here’s why that’s disastrous for education.
Source: How Trigger Warnings Are Hurting Mental Health on Campus – The Atlantic., By Greg Lukianoff & Jonathan Haidt.
Victimhood Culture in America: Beyond Honor and Dignity – Americans increasingly want and expect adult supervision
I thought my idea was so (arguably) funny and original — until I Googled (with quotes) the term unfinished furnitu. Clearly I’m not the first to think of this. At least it’s still funny … to some people.
In 2010, Business Insider CEO and Editor-in-Chief Henry Blodget wrote:
ISPs spend billions of dollars building fiber networks. Why on earth shouldn’t they be able to charge what the market will bear to deliver bits over those networks? If people want their bits delivered quickly and securely, they can pay more. If they don’t, they can pay less. It’s as simple (and fair) as that.
To see how silly the whole concept of “net neutrality” is, all you have to do is glance at the physical world.
Imagine if the Post Office (or FedEx, or UPS, or DHL, or any trucking or transport company) were legally prohibited from charging more for delivering some stuff sooner than other stuff.
Yes, ridiculous. Those shipping and transport companies spent billions of dollars building their transportation networks. They have every right to charge whatever the market will bear to deliver stuff via them.
No one has any problem with the concept that the Post Office treats overnight packages differently than slow-boat ones. Importantly, they also charge different rates depending on what is in the package–see “book rate” and all pricing by weight. So why all this hullaballoo about “NET NEUTRALITY”?
The answer is simple: Self-interest.
Net-neutrality zealots don’t own pipe companies. They haven’t spent billions of dollars building the networks that carry all those bits around. They HAVE spent (collectively) billions of dollars building the bits that get carried around–so of course they’d like to keep that bit-carrying as cheap as possible.
Read the whole article: Stop Moaning About “NET NEUTRALITY” — Of Course ISPs Should Be Able To Charge Higher Rates For Premium Traffic.
Nick Gillespie on Fifty Shades of Gray:
the main function of the Fifty Shades phenomenon is to let lazy elitists showcase their superior taste Mocking the literary merits of work that generates intense audience engagement is, quite frankly, the cheapest sort of criticism. It’s also a go-to move of critics who can’t be bothered to think about why audiences might respond to a given text or the issues that it raises. … Too often, aesthetic snark is simply a means of dodging thought and engagement.
Read the whole article: Fifty Shades of WTF – Hit & Run : Reason.com.