Colorado Amendment 47: “Right to Work” is wrong

Ari Armstrong at FreeColorado.com has some good insight on why Amendment 47 is a bad idea.  Some excerpts:

The problem with Amendment 47 is that it interferes with the freedom of contract. That this interferes with the employee’s “freedom to choose” is irrelevant. … Beyond the context of individual rights, the “freedom to choose” is either meaningless or in direct violation of individual rights. …You do not have the “freedom to choose” to unilaterally force an employer to offer a contract that he does not want to offer. At least, within the bounds of individual rights you have no such freedom.

Is it true that, due to federal controls, unions have the ability to force contractual concessions that they would not be able to achieve on a free market in which the individual rights of both employer and employee are fully protected? Yes, that is true. But two wrongs do not make a right. …

Employers also have the right to create a union shop. Does this interfere with the employee’s “freedom of choice?” No; they retain the freedom to work elsewhere. Contracts are a two-way street, and the rights of both parties must be protected, by the principle of individual rights.

Read the whole post here.

Boulder Ballot Issue 1B: The Power of Compulsory Charity

THe October 10 post at the Foothills United Way blog states:

A penny helps a single mother get affordable child care, so she can work to support her family.

A penny helps an uninsured or under-insured family get access to the medical care they need.

A penny helps feed a family.

That penny is provided by Worthy Cause 1B – a .05 percent tax that equals one cent on each $20 purchase.

No.  That penny is provided by retailers, who get it from their customers.  The so-called “Worthy Cause 1B” is a law that makes it a crime for customers not to give this penny.  The so-called “Worthy Cause” tax provided government force, a threat, to all those who might choose to give their pennies to charitable organizations of their choosing, rather than to a charity that government officials prefer.

Boulder County Ballot Issue 1B is not about whether the causes are worthy.  It’s about using government to force your neighbors to donate to a cause that you deem as “worthy,” which means your neighbors have less money to donate to causes they think are worthy.  As I’ve written before, Ballot Issue 1B is intolerant, arrogant, and elitist.

This tax is sponsored by the so-called “Citizens for a Worthy Cause.”  These are not just ordinary citizens, but the very same non-profits that stand to benefit from the tax, at the expense of non-profits who refrain from using government to raise money.

VoteNo59.com | Colorado Amendment 59

From VoteNo59.com:

Amendment 59 (or “SAFE”) is the proposed amendment to Colorado’s constitution that would increase your taxes by forever funneling your TABOR rebate back to the government, ostensibly to fund P-12 education.

You should vote NO on 59.  Why?  Because:

• It is a permanent tax increase.
• It isn’t about increasing funding for Colorado’s government schools.
• It violates property rights.
• It increases government interference in our economy and our lives.
• It will be bad for Colorado’s economy.
• It will be another boondoggle.
• It is deceptive.

Find out more at: http://www.VoteNo59.com

Boulder Ballot Issue 1B: Follow the money to the “Worthy Causes”

Update to: “Worthy Cause Tax”: It’s not Your Penny to Give.

In a letter published in the Boulder Daily Camera, Rich Miller writes:

Citizens for a Worthy Cause sent out a glossy mailing this past week, encouraging voters to approve Boulder County 1B.  Issue 1B will continue an existing sales tax and allow county commissioners to distribute our tax dollars to the charities of their choice. … And who are these Citizens for a Worthy Cause? No individual citizens contributed, only non-profits who stand to benefit from 1B at our expense.

Rich Miller has made an excellent insight. (Ralph Shnelvar has also noticed.)

Ten of the fifteen organizations that donated to Citizens for a Worthy Cause have received revenue from this sales tax.  These ten organizations have donated almost $27,000 to extend the tax this year, and have received more than $1.8 million in sales tax revenues from previous years.  I flush out the details below. (As Rich also did in his on-line comments.)

In a previous article I made the case that Ballot Initiative 1B, which would extend the “Worthy Cause” sales tax, “is immoral — regardless of how worthy the causes are.”  As a compulsory charity, “it is intolerant to people’s values and unfair to charities that must earn our donations. It undermines both the responsibility of donors and the accountability of non-profits that receive forced donations.” Those who voted for the measure could have raised the money in this year’s Worthy Cause Fund had they each donated $50.  Instead, they force us all to donate.

Colorado’s Secretary of State office lists the contributors to Citizens for a Worthy Cause here.  Boulder County lists the recipients of the tax revenues here.   What follows are the dollar figures for each organization, and links to where you can make a voluntary donation.

Colorado Democracy Alliance wants to “Educate the Idiots”

From Face the State:

In a confidential internal memorandum obtained by Face The State (PDF), the Colorado Democracy Alliance outlines a roster of “operatives” who worked for Democratic victory in the 2006 general election. The document outlines specific tasks for various members of the state’s liberal infrastructure, including a campaign to “educate the idiots,” assigned to the state’s AFL-CIO union. Among the operation’s intended targets: “minorities, GED’s, drop-outs.”

The above is from page 2 of the “strategy group” document.  Read the rest here.
(Image courtesy of Mount Virtus.)

Amendment 49 | The Ivory Tower Explanation

Jon Caldera explains the proposed Amendment 49 to the Colorado constitution.

From EthicalStandardsNow.org:

Government should not be the bagman for special interests. Amendment 49 will prohibit governments from bundling money from public employees’ paychecks and delivering the cash to special interests who use it to lobby politicians. Government should be using our tax dollars to provide crucial public services, not to funnel money to political organizations. Amendment 49 keeps lobbyists in line.

Here are its endorsements.

American election choices: theocrat or socialist?

Writes Ari Armstrong on why Libby Szabo lost his vote for Colorado’s State Senate District 19:

In races across the country, voters face terrible choices, with theocrats on one side, socialists on the other.

Nearly a year ago, I sent a letter to various candidates asking them to endorse the separation of church and state. While I never got around to sending the letter to the state senate candidates,  Szabo has made it clear that she strongly endorses faith-based politics. Which is why I strongly oppose her.

I have been arguing for months that a major reason Republicans have killed themselves in Colorado is their unflagging commitment to faith-based politics. …

Maybe someday Colorado Republicans will learn that the Interior West leans toward liberty and away from faith-based politics. There are some hopeful signs. Until then, I guess I’m a Democrat by default, as much as that sickens me.

Read the whole post here.

Ballot Issue 1B: “Worthy Cause” Tax, It’s Not Your Penny to Give

The Daily Camera published my article on the 2008 Boulder County Ballot Issue 1B today. (print version)

Update: The so-called “Citizens for a Worthy Cause” that support this are really the very organizations that receive the tax revenue.  See here.

Ballot Issue 1B: It’s not Your Penny to Give
by Brian T. Schwartz

Would you call the police on someone who didn’t donate to a charity that you consider to be a “worthy cause”?  If not, then you should oppose County Issue 1B in this November’s election, which would extend the so-called “Worthy Cause” sales tax.  This tax is immoral — regardless of how worthy the causes are. It is compulsory charity, or charity at gun-point. It is intolerant to people’s values and unfair to charities that must earn our donations. It undermines both the responsibility of donors and the accountability of non-profits that receive forced donations.

Why Only Bush Could Bring Socialism to America

Writes economist Bryan Caplan at George Mason U.:

If a Democratic president were backing a $700B bail-out, I have to think that Republicans would be crying “Socialism!” But if a Republican president does the same, the bail-out’s natural enemies keep silent out of loyalty or ingroup bias. It’s a lot like the contemporary Republican reaction to Nixon’s price controls – if our boy is doing it, how bad can it be?

The scary thing is that once party Y gives the Inane a chance, party X may be able to finish the job without credible resistance. After party Y surrenders the rhetorical high ground by embracing the Inane, what’s to stop party X from making Inanity a way of life?

Read the whole post here.

Amendment 46: Fairness in hiring, admissions

In today’s Denver Post, Jessica Peck Corry of the Colorado Civil Rights Initiative writes:

The Colorado Civil Rights Initiative would once and for all prohibit our government from discriminating on the basis of race or gender in public education, public contracting, and public hiring.

Every day in Colorado, our government preaches to women and minorities that we are intellectually inferior second-class citizens. We’re told that because of our biology and past discrimination, we need special preferences to succeed. Nothing could be further from the truth. Disadvantage and discrimination transcend race and gender lines in today’s America.

Read the rest here.