<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Brian T. Schwartz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wakalix.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wakalix.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Life, liberty, &#38; the pursuit of happiness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jared Polis on U.S. Postal Service: end its &#8220;monopolistic protections and special treatment&#8221; by Brian S.</title>
		<link>http://wakalix.wordpress.com/2011/12/08/jared-polis-usps-post-office/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakalix.com/wp/?p=1827#comment-273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: &quot;for someone who is  usually so interested in constitutional fidelity, i&#039;m surprised you leave out the  fact that the US postal service was established by the founders in article one of the constitution.&quot;

Article I, Section 8 says &quot;The Congress shall have Power … To establish Post Offices.&quot; It does not say that the Congress *must* establish a Post Office. Nor does it say that the Post Office it shall establishes must have the monopolies and special privileges I mentioned in the above article.

The same section grants Congress the power to declare war. But this doesn&#039;t mean that if Congress refrains from declaring war in a certain situation, it is violating the Constitution.

Being Constitutionally authorized is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for good policy.

Re: &quot;you also fail to mention that it is the ONLY federal agency required to pre-fund its pension obligations, and that without this requirement it wouldn&#039;t be losing money at all.&quot;

Paragraph 3 above says the following, which is pretty close to your statement above: &quot;Further, you must pre-fund your retirees’ health benefits, which your Postmaster General says is &#039;effectively bankrupting&#039; you.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: &#8220;for someone who is  usually so interested in constitutional fidelity, i&#8217;m surprised you leave out the  fact that the US postal service was established by the founders in article one of the constitution.&#8221;</p>
<p>Article I, Section 8 says &#8220;The Congress shall have Power … To establish Post Offices.&#8221; It does not say that the Congress *must* establish a Post Office. Nor does it say that the Post Office it shall establishes must have the monopolies and special privileges I mentioned in the above article.</p>
<p>The same section grants Congress the power to declare war. But this doesn&#8217;t mean that if Congress refrains from declaring war in a certain situation, it is violating the Constitution.</p>
<p>Being Constitutionally authorized is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for good policy.</p>
<p>Re: &#8220;you also fail to mention that it is the ONLY federal agency required to pre-fund its pension obligations, and that without this requirement it wouldn&#8217;t be losing money at all.&#8221;</p>
<p>Paragraph 3 above says the following, which is pretty close to your statement above: &#8220;Further, you must pre-fund your retirees’ health benefits, which your Postmaster General says is &#8216;effectively bankrupting&#8217; you.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jared Polis on U.S. Postal Service: end its &#8220;monopolistic protections and special treatment&#8221; by Ben Knowles</title>
		<link>http://wakalix.wordpress.com/2011/12/08/jared-polis-usps-post-office/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Knowles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakalix.com/wp/?p=1827#comment-272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[for someone who is  usually so interested in constitutional fidelity, i&#039;m surprised you leave out the  fact that the US postal service was established by the founders in article one of the constitution. you also fail to mention that it is the ONLY federal agency required to pre-fund its pension obligations, and that without this requirement it wouldn&#039;t be losing money at all. 
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for someone who is  usually so interested in constitutional fidelity, i&#8217;m surprised you leave out the  fact that the US postal service was established by the founders in article one of the constitution. you also fail to mention that it is the ONLY federal agency required to pre-fund its pension obligations, and that without this requirement it wouldn&#8217;t be losing money at all. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Colorado Proposition 103: More tax dollars for schools does not improve kids&#8217; education by Prop. 103 supporters: You can still donate more of your own earnings to tax-funded schools&#160;&#124;&#160;Independence Institute</title>
		<link>http://wakalix.wordpress.com/2011/10/02/colorado-proposition-103-test-scores/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prop. 103 supporters: You can still donate more of your own earnings to tax-funded schools&#160;&#124;&#160;Independence Institute]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakalix.com/wp/?p=1709#comment-271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] education. Where&#8217;s the evidence?  As I documented in a recent Denver Post op-ed, national standardized test scores for 17-year-olds have been essentially flat since the early &#8217;70s, while real-dollar per-pupil [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] education. Where&#8217;s the evidence?  As I documented in a recent Denver Post op-ed, national standardized test scores for 17-year-olds have been essentially flat since the early &#8217;70s, while real-dollar per-pupil [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Colorado Proposition 103: More tax dollars for schools does not improve kids&#8217; education by Prop. 103 supporters: You can still donate more of your own earnings to tax-funded schools &#124; wakalix</title>
		<link>http://wakalix.wordpress.com/2011/10/02/colorado-proposition-103-test-scores/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prop. 103 supporters: You can still donate more of your own earnings to tax-funded schools &#124; wakalix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 04:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakalix.com/wp/?p=1709#comment-270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] education. Where&#8217;s the evidence?  As I documented in a recent Denver Post op-ed, national standardized test scores for 17-year-olds have been essentially flat since the early &#8217;70s, while real-dollar per-pupil [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] education. Where&#8217;s the evidence?  As I documented in a recent Denver Post op-ed, national standardized test scores for 17-year-olds have been essentially flat since the early &#8217;70s, while real-dollar per-pupil [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Harry Kalas calls Mike Schmidt&#8217;s 500th home run by Philadelphia Phillies’ Fans Must Realize that Ryan Howard is like Thome, Not Pujols: Fan Opinion at hoops227.net</title>
		<link>http://wakalix.wordpress.com/2009/04/13/harry-kalas-mike-schmidt-500-home-run/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philadelphia Phillies’ Fans Must Realize that Ryan Howard is like Thome, Not Pujols: Fan Opinion at hoops227.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakalix.com/wp/?p=482#comment-194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 3-0 pitch. Swing and a long drive! There it is! Number 500 for Michael Jack Schmidt,&#8221; Harry Kalas emotionally announced on April 18, 1987. Everyone who [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3-0 pitch. Swing and a long drive! There it is! Number 500 for Michael Jack Schmidt,&#8221; Harry Kalas emotionally announced on April 18, 1987. Everyone who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Boulder &amp; Denver bike-share: boon or boondoggle? by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://wakalix.wordpress.com/2011/05/23/boulder-denver-bike-share-boon-boondoggle/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 17:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakalix.com/wp/?p=1632#comment-269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Woah, thanks for catching that error, Allen!  I just corrected it.  

The Camera article said &quot;No taxpayer money will be used in the Denver program.&quot; Note the future tense, which does not rule out tax dollars already spent. I think saying &quot;No *more* taxpayer money...&quot; would have been better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah, thanks for catching that error, Allen!  I just corrected it.  </p>
<p>The Camera article said &#8220;No taxpayer money will be used in the Denver program.&#8221; Note the future tense, which does not rule out tax dollars already spent. I think saying &#8220;No *more* taxpayer money&#8230;&#8221; would have been better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Boulder &amp; Denver bike-share: boon or boondoggle? by Allen G</title>
		<link>http://wakalix.wordpress.com/2011/05/23/boulder-denver-bike-share-boon-boondoggle/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allen G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakalix.com/wp/?p=1632#comment-268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not that I&#039;m a fan of spending taxpayer money on these programs but $210 million for B-Cycle sounded insane.  It was $210,00.

Speaking of taxpayer money, how does the writer at the Daily Camera write that $210,000 was granted to the program and then a couple paragraphs later write that no taxpayer money went to the program?  

And that doesn&#039;t even touch on to non-cash taxpayer contributions that you eluded to.   And of course after all that help, B-Cycle still only serves it&#039;s key voting class and not &quot;unimportant&quot; neighborhoods where this program would do a lot more good than helping out a bunch of middle class folks that can afford a bicycle.

&quot;That group received $210,000 in federal stimulus money last year,&quot;Read more:Denver beats Boulder to public bike-share program - Boulder Daily Camerahttp://www.dailycamera.com/news/ci_14998719#ixzz1NlDijQNDDailyCamera.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I&#8217;m a fan of spending taxpayer money on these programs but $210 million for B-Cycle sounded insane.  It was $210,00.</p>
<p>Speaking of taxpayer money, how does the writer at the Daily Camera write that $210,000 was granted to the program and then a couple paragraphs later write that no taxpayer money went to the program?  </p>
<p>And that doesn&#8217;t even touch on to non-cash taxpayer contributions that you eluded to.   And of course after all that help, B-Cycle still only serves it&#8217;s key voting class and not &#8220;unimportant&#8221; neighborhoods where this program would do a lot more good than helping out a bunch of middle class folks that can afford a bicycle.</p>
<p>&#8220;That group received $210,000 in federal stimulus money last year,&#8221;Read more:Denver beats Boulder to public bike-share program &#8211; Boulder Daily Camerahttp://www.dailycamera.com/news/ci_14998719#ixzz1NlDijQNDDailyCamera.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Boulder &amp; Denver bike-share: boon or boondoggle? by Allen G</title>
		<link>http://wakalix.wordpress.com/2011/05/23/boulder-denver-bike-share-boon-boondoggle/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allen G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakalix.com/wp/?p=1632#comment-267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not that I&#039;m a fan of spending taxpayer money on these programs but $210 million for B-Cycle sounded insane.  It was $210,00.

Speaking of taxpayer money, how does the writer at the Daily Camera write that $210,000 was granted to the program and then a couple paragraphs later write that no taxpayer money went to the program?  

And that doesn&#039;t even touch on to non-cash taxpayer contributions that you eluded to.   And of course after all that help, B-Cycle still only serves it&#039;s key voting class and not &quot;unimportant&quot; neighborhoods where this program would do a lot more good than helping out a bunch of middle class folks that can afford a bicycle.

&quot;That group received $210,000 in federal stimulus money last year,&quot;Read more:Denver beats Boulder to public bike-share program - Boulder Daily Camerahttp://www.dailycamera.com/news/ci_14998719#ixzz1NlDijQNDDailyCamera.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I&#8217;m a fan of spending taxpayer money on these programs but $210 million for B-Cycle sounded insane.  It was $210,00.</p>
<p>Speaking of taxpayer money, how does the writer at the Daily Camera write that $210,000 was granted to the program and then a couple paragraphs later write that no taxpayer money went to the program?  </p>
<p>And that doesn&#8217;t even touch on to non-cash taxpayer contributions that you eluded to.   And of course after all that help, B-Cycle still only serves it&#8217;s key voting class and not &#8220;unimportant&#8221; neighborhoods where this program would do a lot more good than helping out a bunch of middle class folks that can afford a bicycle.</p>
<p>&#8220;That group received $210,000 in federal stimulus money last year,&#8221;Read more:Denver beats Boulder to public bike-share program &#8211; Boulder Daily Camerahttp://www.dailycamera.com/news/ci_14998719#ixzz1NlDijQNDDailyCamera.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Derren Brown hypnosis for color-blindness, personal growth, and instant religious conversion by Prateek Panchal</title>
		<link>http://wakalix.wordpress.com/2007/09/02/derren-brown-neurolinguistic-programming-and-overcoming-personal-barriers/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prateek Panchal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakalix.com/wp/?p=268#comment-90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colobob.....lol!!!!!

I wonder if there would be any reasonable cure for color blindness

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eyehealthguide.net/color-blindness.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Color blindness&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colobob&#8230;..lol!!!!!</p>
<p>I wonder if there would be any reasonable cure for color blindness</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eyehealthguide.net/color-blindness.html" rel="nofollow">Color blindness</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Universal&#8221; Health Care Kills by Prateek Panchal</title>
		<link>http://wakalix.wordpress.com/2008/03/13/universal-health-care-kills/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prateek Panchal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakalix.com/wp/2008/03/13/universalcoverage-kills/#comment-108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is really so true.....i appreciate this.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.healthyskinguide.net/what-does-eczema-look-like.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;What does eczema look like&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really so true&#8230;..i appreciate this.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.healthyskinguide.net/what-does-eczema-look-like.html" rel="nofollow">What does eczema look like</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

